sade050

By Mark Conlon In this short analysis I will explore a theory that has been circulating the internet regarding Flight 175's plane wing briefly passing behind the edge of the North Tower Building in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage. Many people have thought that this was proof and evidence that the Michael Hezarkhani's video was fabricated. See image below: To briefly explain why the plane's wing appears to be going behind the North Tower's edge in this version above of the Michael Hezarkhani video, is because the video has been converted into "super" slow-motion. This is a process which takes a normal video recording at 30fps and makes it into 60fps or even 90fps using some computer software. This is so the video runs smoother when viewed in slow-motion.  The process to create a "super" slow-motion effect basically creates interpreted frames between the "original" frames. So the frame being created is not entirely a genuine frame, as it...

By Mark Conlon This is a short analysis I will examine Steve De'ak's claim which he made during an interview with Jim Fetzer on the 26th March 2017, where he claimed the smoke/fumes plume in the Michael Hezarkhani video "freezes". After hearing this claim I decided to conduct a short analysis on the 13th April 2017 and I am publishing the findings here today after clarifying some information from Steve De'ak on the 10th July 2017. The reason for asking Steve De'ak for clarification was because I was unsure of the exact time-frame he referred to in the video footage. This is what lead me to conduct two different time-frame studies of the video footage smoke/fumes plume. See the both analysis findings below. See below: "close-up" comparison of the smoke/fumes plume characteristic differences in the different frames, from just before the plane "crashes" into the South Tower to when the plane "impacts" the South Tower. The two ana...

By Mark Conlon In this analysis I would like to draw attention to a blog article which was published on 16th February 2014 by an " anonymous " 9/11 researcher who goes under the pseudonym 'One Born Free' (OBF). Article link: http://onebornfrees911researchreview.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/911-scams-why-jim-fetzerace-baker-and.html The thrust of the article states that the Michael Hezarkhani video of 'Flight 175' impacting the South Tower is a " 100% digital fabrication ", defining that a plane was not inserted into a real piece of video footage, and neither a hologram was captured in the videos and photographs.  In the article the author is not shy of naming people and organisations who he believes lack "imagery analysis" skills to conduct research of the video and photographic evidence of 9/11. Does this suggest he believes he does possess such "imagery analysis" skills? O ne might interpret his comment that he does consider himself...

By Mark Conlon Following-on from my part one analysis , in this short part two analysis I’m going to study more claims made by Simon Shack in his September Clues – Addendum film, where he claims all of the live network television footage depicting the South Tower’s destruction is “ fake ”. Simon Shack bases his claims on the presence and movements of a helicopter (PAT) flying in the vicinity of the South Tower, prior to the South Tower’s destruction.   At 6:19 into the film, Simon Shack claims that 'Chopper 2' (CBS) filming from the south behind the towers is no where to be seen on any available 9/11 footage. See below: screen-shot. I was able to find some MSNBC news coverage footage which shows both 'PAT' the helicopter and 'Chopper 2' filming the South Tower as it is destroyed. Simon Shack claims no footage of 'Chopper 2' exists. See below: screen-shot. Simon Shack also debunks himself again here below, as he points out 'PAT' in this ...

By Mark Conlon In this analysis I’m going to study claims made by Simon Shack in his September Clues – Addendum film, where he claims all of the live network television footage depicting the South Tower’s destruction is “ fake ”. Simon Shack bases his claims on the presence and movements of a helicopter (PAT) flying in the vicinity of the South Tower, prior to the South Tower’s destruction. I will also study Simon Shack’s methods which he uses to support his claims.       Reference: You can find Simon Shack’s Addendum film here on his official YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/UGyW-0MeBOU Which I have used and referenced as part of my analysis. Analysis of September Clues - Addendum: At 1:00 into the film, Simon Shack attempts to establish the presence and movement of (PAT) the helicopter using three different videos from three different views. The first video he uses is an amateur video taken by Devin Clark, which was taken from 1 Penn Plaza, Suite 2401, 34 th St...