sade050

By Mark Conlon In this short blog post I want to draw attention to some strange anomalies captured in various videos and photographs during Flight 175's approach towards the South Tower before it crashed. Please see a selection below of the video still images and photographs showing the anomalies. To begin my analysis please see the Park Foreman video still image below: Many people have tried to explain these strange white anomalies as paper which was ejected from the North Tower after it go its damage from the "alleged" plane. However if you look at the size of the "alleged" plane in this still video image from the Park Foreman video, the anomalous objects would have to be far too large to be pieces of paper flying around in the air. Plus, the anomalous objects, that if indeed they are solid objects showing-up in different frames of the video as the "alleged" plane approaches the South Tower.     Here's a closer look at the Park Foreman video stil

By: Mark Conlon He is a short video made by the late Anthony Lawson, who made some great observations in relation to Simon Shack's presentation of evidence regardng the plane "nose-out" comparisons which Simon Shack produced in his September Clues film, to prove the nose of the plane exited the South Tower in the Fox News "Chopper 5" video footage. As we can see Simon Shack has used a very deceptive way to present his evidence. This has been a common theme with Simon Shack and throughout all his September Clues films, which can no longer be trusted to present video evidence objectively. What is Simon Shack's mission? Great work by the late Anthony Lawson. R.I.P. To find out more about Simon (Hytten) Shack and his mission, read this article by Andrew Johnson:   9 or 11 “Clues” about Simon Shack and a 3D-Analysis of Flight 175 Thank you watching and caring!   

See below: Simon Shack's comment to this video on Steve De'ak's YouTube channel. While Steve De'ak admitted his mistake, which I commend him for doing, Simon Shack reverted to using disrespectful names in his comment by calling people " clowns " and " goons " and would rather accuse people of being shills. Please note: Simon Shack doesn't say the video isn't wrong in its proof that it was not "video fakery", however would rather avoid that point by promoting another "false" video about an "alleged" 21-ft tall jumper video.  This is classic avoidance by Simon (Hytten) Shack, which speaks volumes as to what Shack's role is by promoting "falsehoods" while accusing others of doing the same as he has been doing since 2007 in his films. I have been quite sceptical of Steve De'ak's points he has promoted in the past, but he has admitted his mistake in this case, and also about his "Frozen Smok

By Mark Conlon An area of research we never hear too much about anymore is the two "mystery" planes flying in and around the vicinity during the second "alleged" plane event where allegedly "Flight 175" impacted the South Tower in NY. The FBI were aware of at least one of those two "mystery" planes, as reported by Jennifer Spell a videographer who captured the "mystery" plane in the background as "Flight 175" crashed into the South Tower in her video footage. She provided the FBI with a copy of her video which showed a "second" plane parallelling the "alleged" United Airlines "Flight 175" plane. To my knowledge nothing more was ever disclosed to Jennifer Spell by the FBI ( during their visit for a viewing at her home of the video footage) as to what the second plane was doing in that area at the time of the plane crash into the South Tower. Jennifer Spell Video (2nd Mystery Plane)       Other vide

By Mark Conlon This is the first in a series of "new" analysis into the impossibility of Live TV Fakery in the 9/11 video by someone on YouTube called 'Conspiracy Cuber'. The analysis seriously challenges claims made by 9/11 researchers' such as, Simon Shack, Ace Baker and others to many to name here.  Video description below:   Ace Baker's Deceptions and WNYW Chopper 5 - is the beginning of a series where the live shots are examined and judged according to Ace Baker's 9 traits. In this one I cover Ace's contradictory logic and the Chopper 5 video. The Complete Impossibility of Live TV Fakery - Part 1 The Complete Impossibility of Live TV Fakery - Part 2  The Complete Impossibility of Live TV Fakery - Part 3   To find out more, please visit Conspiracy Cuber's YouTube Channel here: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC3rgxhxZ3tS38Jcw7fB6EKQ Please Note: As more videos are posted in this series of analysis I will add them to this blogpost, so ch

By Mark Conlon For sometime now I have been unsure about the Fox News "Chopper 5" nose-out video footage showing a plane's nose "exiting" the South Tower building. My initial reasons for my doubts were firstly alerted when Richard D. Hall did a comparison study on the plane's nose before it entered the South Tower building and afterwards as it exits the building. Richard's study comparisons were in contrast to what Simon Shack presented in his September Clues film, which led me to be not as convinced regarding it being a plane's nose exiting the South Tower. I referenced this video clip in an article called : September Clues - Layers of Deception - (Part Two) - Published Wednesday, 5 October 2016 http://mark-conlon.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/september-clues-layers-of-deception.html See video clip below: My article I link to above does discuss differences in the plane shaped nose, and I suggest some type of manipulation took place of the plane nose shape

By Mark Conlon This video analysis has been made in response to a video that was uploaded to YouTube by "No Planer TV" - Ryan Rodrigues. My video analysis rebuttal is intended to "point-out" errors in "BS Registration's" claims he raises in relation to the Michael Hezarkhani video being fake. The errors I'm pointing-out are "factual" errors not fiction, unlike the ones suggested in "BS Registration's" video. I'm also questioning the veracity of the weight both Peggy Carter "AKA" Pearl Vasudha Chanter and Ryan Rodrigues place in Simon Shack's September Clues film as the "best" evidence to prove fraud" as Peggy Carter says in Ryan Rodrigues' video which I address in my analysis and rebuttal video.  I also deal with this image and comment posted by Ryan Rodrigues below: Ryan Rodrigues posted this image on 2nd October 2017, 2 days after being told by Andrew Johnson (Admin) not to post anym

By Mark Conlon Short introduction: In this blog-post I'm going to share an important conversation I had with Jim Huibregtse, a first hand 9/11 eyewitness and videographer in NYC at the time of the first plane strike and the rest of the events in NYC. Jim Huibregtse captured the North Tower's damage roughly 5 to 10 seconds after the first plane hit. The reason for my contacting him was because I had cited his video as evidence against Simon Shack's claims regarding the plane shaped hole being made bigger using photo-shopping in Richard D. Hall's show and my blog articles. Jim's video proved that Simon Shack was wrong. I also wanted to know what video camera he was using, when he videoed the North Tower's damage. (Brief clip of Jim Huibregtse video) below:   I also expressed my concern that people who videoed the plane hitting the South Tower were accused of fabricating their videos, something which I do not believe after studying most of the video evidence invo