Analysis of Steve De'ak's Claim Regarding the Michael Hezarkhani Video "Plane Gash"


By Mark Conlon


This is a short video I made addressing Steve De'ak's claims on Jim Fetzer's show on the 16th June 2017. Steve De'ak claimed that Michael Hezarkhani fabricated and manipulated his video footage of the plane shaped gash in the South Tower building. In this analysis I demonstrate that Michael Hezarkhani did not manipulated his video by adding smoke or blurring-out the plane hole gash, as Steve De'ak claims. 

  

This video has not been made to discredit Steve De'ak or personally attack him, it has been made to point-out what I believe to be an "invalid" theory that Steve De'ak presented on Jim Fetzer's show. 

As I have already stated in my response on 19th Decemeber to Steve De'ak's blog post on the 17th December 2017, I would be happy to point-out any areas where I felt Steve is correct in his analysis of the plane gash damage in the North Tower which he presents in his videos. I have not fully researched this area to reach any conclusion regarding Steve's ideas/theories. My main focus and contention has been analysing the claims made in relation to the video footage which many 9/11 researchers present as "video fakery". I felt this was a valid example which needed addressing. I welcome any feedback through the "Contact Form" located at the bottom of the right-hand side-bar of my blog page. 


Thank you for reading, watching and caring...



      

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of United Airlines ‘Flight 175’

Image
By Mark Conlon I would like to begin by thanking Julia Ratsey and Conspiracy Cuber for their help towards this blog post. Also thanks to Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall and Chris Hampton who have been supportive of my research.   United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAL 175) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles International Airport, in Los Angeles, California. On September 11 th 2001 UAL 175 was scheduled to depart at 08:00 a.m. for Los Angeles. Allegedly fifty-one passengers and the five hijackers boarded the 767 through Terminal C's Gate 19. The plane pushed back at 07:58 a.m. and took off at 08:14 a.m. from runway 9. It is estimated that UAL 175 was hijacked between 08:42 a.m. and 08:46 a.m. while American Airlines “Flight 11” (AAL 11) was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower. We are told the hijackers forcibly breached the cockpit and overpowered the pilot and first officer, allowing lead hijac...
Read more

Who Is 9/11 Harley Guy..? "Seeing Through The Disinformation"

Image
  By Mark Conlon   Much has been made in recent years of the use of "crisis actors" involved in relation to 9/11 and a number of " staged " terrorist attacks that followed. Much of the early promotion of "crisis actors" originated and was heavily promoted by Simon Shack, along with other so-called 9/11 researchers'.  One of the most famous 9/11 cases was the "Harley Guy" on Fox News who gave an account of the " official " 9/11 WTC building collapse story from the get-go, or did he? There has been many people who believe the "Harley Guy" to be actor Mark Adrian Humphries. Of course Mark Humphries denies any involvement on 9/11, and claims he was in Los Angeles at the time the 9/11 events were happening. See image below: Taken from Simon Shack's - September Clues forum.  So who is the "Harley Guy"? I still see and hear people accusing Mark Humphries of being the "Harley Guy". From research which doesn...
Read more

Flight 175 and The Truth about 'The Truth in 7 Minutes' in FIVE Minutes

Image
By: Mark Conlon - 25 Jan 2014   (Updated 24 Feb 2017) Short introduction and note by Andrew Johnson [ADJ] Below, Mark has carefully documented some further errors made by Markus Allen in a recent response to another error he made in an earlier video. The thrust of what Markus Allen appears to be trying to say is that “the videos of Flight 175 crashing into the WTC are fake”. This, of course, has been a topic much discussed on 9/11 “truth” websites. I have come to the conclusion, partly because of what I have covered in this article, that there has been a deliberate attempt to promote the 9/11 video fakery position in order to obscure or cover up the knowledge of the use of some type of image projection technology, which was used to create a very powerful illusion of plane crashes (for those chuckling about this idea, simply try and account for the physical evidence that plane wings cannot cut through steel box-girders and also account for the fact that some witnesses did not see or...
Read more