"IMPORTANT NEW UPDATE" 7th Jan 2018 - Steve De'ak's Inaccurate Comments


By Mark Conlon


This update has also been added to the end of an article I wrote. (See link below). The update is a response in relation to Steve De'ak's latest inaccurate Facebook comments about me.

Setting The Record Straight About The Michael Hezarkhani Video

    It now appears that Steve De'ak is now responding to an article I wrote by calling me a "Con"? So he is now reverting to name calling, and not talking about the actual content of my video analysis I produced.



    He admits in his latest Facebook comment that he didn't read or listen to what I was saying in my video, as he only read a so-called apparent "frauds" list. This is an inaccurate reference in his comment, as I make no reference to the list being a "list of frauds" in my article, which he would have realiesed if he had read the article or watched the videos. In the paragraph I provide a "brief" history of "No-Planes", then show a list of people who have promoted video fakery, No-Planes and also holograms.



    Please Note: The two people I refer to in my article above Rosalee Grable AKA (The Webfairy) and Gerard Holmgren are no longer with us on this planet.. which I reflected in the article saying "Sadly both are no longer with us".. 

    If you read through all my previous blogs, there is no reference to either Rosalee Grable or Gerard Holmgren, and certainly NOT in a "negative" light, or being called "FRAUDS" in my blog articles, I merely quote a fact that both believed "No-Planes" were involved in the WTC attacks, and also believe TV Fakery/Video Fakery was involved, which I disagree with. Rosalee herself has many times made clear during many interviews her position on the subject, and archive history is the same for Gerard Holmgren. I just state their last known position on the subject which is factual.

    Please Note: The list accurately states that Steve De'ak has promoted Video Fakery, No Planes and Crash Test. At no-point is he called a "fraud" or was the list called a "frauds list". In my articles I have always been respectful towards Steve De'ak, and expressed why I disagree with his findings or theories regarding "video fakery" and the Hezarkhani video.



    In fact I showed Steve De'ak credit for showing "humility" twice and admitting when he was wrong about two theories he had changed his position on after observing new evidence. So I am not quite sure as to why he feels this is bad to document people's inaccurate theories, or make light of the changes in their positions once held.



    I even quoted where I had changed my own position on the Fox News - Chopper5 "Nose-out" sequence because of new evidence presented to me. So Steve's issues towards myself pointing-out when people are wrong in their theories, according Steve De'ak makes me a "CON", which doesn't really quite sit with the investigative research method, as after all my main body of research has proven conclusively the many flaws in Simon Shack's - September Clues film. Is this something I should not have talked about or pointed out regarding the "incorrect" points which are made by Simon Shack, or should I have kept quite about it so we can all still believe the inaccurate points proposed by Simon Shack in his September Clues film? Would this bring around progress in finding the truth, just so people can feel nice and comfortable in their "comfort zone"... NO! So why does Steve claim this is a dishonest practice, and not someone looking to find the truth...?

    Please Note: I have not called Steve De'ak a "fraud", as he claimed I have in his latest Facebook comment. I would ask him to produce evidence of me calling him personally a FRAUD...?



    I also corrected Steve's claim that I had deleted my YouTube comments, which I addressed in my recent response 19/12/2017 to Steve's De'ak's questions to me on his blog/website 17/12/2017. As I explained my 'YouTube Channel' was closed down by YouTube, thus deleting all my comments in the thread, not by myself deleting my comments which he again has "inaccurately" repeated in his latest Facebook comments.

    On a final note, what is clear all this diverts attention away from the "original" findings of the analysis I did regarding the Hezarkhani video, thus pointing-out the incorrect claims made about the Michael Hezarkhani video and also my analysis of Steve De'ak's claim about Michael Hezarkhani fuzzing-out, blurring and fabricating his video evidence to conceal the plane gash, which I believe to be incorrect, and based on no evidence offered other than what Steve De'ak says Michael Hezarkhani did to his video.  


    So I will leave it to the viewer/reader of the article and update to make of Steve De'ak's claims about me and to draw their own conclusions...

     
    Thank you for reading and caring...




     

    Comments

    Post a Comment

    Popular posts from this blog

    9/11 Airplane Video Compositing & Luma Key Theory DEBUNKED!

    Image
     By Mark Conlon In this analysis I’m going to explore Ace Baker's theory he proposes in his blogspot article video he published on the 27th May 2008, entitled - "Theory of Live 9/11 Airplanes Composites" and also in a later version which he included in his 2012 film entitled - "9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera". They both explain how he believes video compositing was used on 9/11 to " insert " in real-time, a flying airplane into the Fox News "Chopper 5" video. I will primarily be focusing my analysis on his later film - Chapter 7, called "The Key" from "9/11 The Great American Psy-Oprah". http://acebaker.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/theory-of-live-911-airplane-composites.html See below: Ace Baker's Theory of Live 9/11 Airplane Composites video: In Ace Baker's 2012 film 'The 9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera' - Chapter 7 "The Key", he explains how he believes a "fake" airplane was "...
    Read more

    In Search of United Airlines ‘Flight 175’

    Image
    By Mark Conlon I would like to begin by thanking Julia Ratsey and Conspiracy Cuber for their help towards this blog post. Also thanks to Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall and Chris Hampton who have been supportive of my research.   United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAL 175) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles International Airport, in Los Angeles, California. On September 11 th 2001 UAL 175 was scheduled to depart at 08:00 a.m. for Los Angeles. Allegedly fifty-one passengers and the five hijackers boarded the 767 through Terminal C's Gate 19. The plane pushed back at 07:58 a.m. and took off at 08:14 a.m. from runway 9. It is estimated that UAL 175 was hijacked between 08:42 a.m. and 08:46 a.m. while American Airlines “Flight 11” (AAL 11) was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower. We are told the hijackers forcibly breached the cockpit and overpowered the pilot and first officer, allowing lead hijac...
    Read more

    Who is Alexander Ace Baker (Colin Alexander)...?

    Image
    By Mark Conlon I came across this fascinating video called "Who is Alexander Ace Baker". As part of my research I have been studying some of the background connections Ace Baker has... His arrival and presence in the "no-planes" movement is somewhat dubious following the strange behaviour that followed involving him "faking" his own suicide on Jim Fetzer's show, while causing division at the same time in the "no-planes" community.  It has also has been shown that he was deliberately promoting "false" video fakery information, thus consequenly casting doubt in people's mind over the authenticity of the video evidence record of "Flight 175". He also denounced the use of holographic technology.  I shall be exploring more about Ace Baker in a lot more depth in a future blog...  Video information below:   Published on 14 Jul 2009 : Who is Alexander Ace Baker Alexander "Ace" Baker AKA Alexander Collin derives his y...
    Read more