Markus Allen's Disappearing Buildings on 9/11



By: Mark Conlon: 8th July 2014


This is the third analysis that I have conducted into claims made by Markus Allen in relation to a historical video taken by Michael Hezarkhani on September 11th 2001, whereby Michael Hezarkhani captured video footage of ‘Flight 175’ hitting the South Tower.

To my disbelief Markus Allen has yet another claim about the Michael Hezarkhani video. He now claims that the surrounding buildings are missing from the Michael Hezarkhani video footage. At first glance the claim can seem quite convincing and credible, especially if you are not as familiar with the evidence he provides to prove his claim. (Luckily I’m very familiar with the videos and photographical evidence of 'Flight 175').


To advance his new claim Markus Allen provides a ‘snap shot’ (or single frame) from the Michael Hezarkhani video to convince people that the buildings are missing from the video, thus proving 'video fakery' in Markus Allen's opinion, which seems to be the on-going agenda regarding the Michael Hezarkhani video. In my analysis I will demonstrate some of the inaccurate observations made by Markus Allen or at worst suggest a deliberate attempt to distort video evidence, to forward his own agenda to promote video fakery.

The ‘snap-shot’ below is a single frame taken from the Michael Hezarkhani video, which Markus Allen uses on his website to claim that buildings are missing from the Michael Hezarkhani video footage.


Let’s take a closer look at Markus Allen’s claims, by studying all the available evidence, and not just a deceptive and selective single snap-shot taken from the Michael Hezarkhani video footage...

To understand which buildings Markus Allen believes are missing from the Michael Hezarkhani video, I will use some comparison pictures which point out the two buildings in more detail, so we can gain a better understanding of the two buildings and their locations.

See the comparison pictures below:


 

  
In the comparison pictures above I've pointed out the main two buildings in question so we can gain a better understanding of their locations, so we can locate them in the Michael Hezarkhani video.

Below I've used a comparison picture compared to a later 'zoomed out' shot in the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video. Clearly the two buildings I've pointed out in the comparison picture are visible in the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video picture.

Below I'm using an identical snap-shot from the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video, which is at the same moment in time as Markus Allen's snap-shot video picture. I've pointed out the buildings in question in Michael Hezarkhani's raw video version, which Markus Allen claims are "MISSING"
Note: If you want to view the Michael Hezarkhani  video I'm using in this article please follow this link: https://youtu.be/ZsP-Gt52P2A

See Markus Allen's snap-shot below:


Several problems and anomalies arise when we view these two pictures together


Below I've highlighted the cropped areas using red lines which I've inserted on to the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video below to help highlight the cropped areas on Markus Allen's snap-shot video picture, which can clearly be seen when compared to the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video image.


The explosion in the Markus Allen picture seems to be cut off at the top of the explosion, whereas in the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video picture the explosion can be seen in full. The same problem happens with the bottom of the Markus Allen picture, where the buildings have been cut off and cannot be seen? Yet in the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video picture that I’ve used, the buildings in question can be seen underneath the South Tower, along with the other buildings on the right hand side of picture, which have also been cut off in the Markus Allen picture. What does this suggest?

This could suggest that Markus Allen’s video snap-shot picture has either been cropped to remove the buildings or another possible explanation is the aspect ratio that the video has been previously recorded in or uploaded to, is incorrect, which could suggest why it has been inadvertently cut-off at the top, bottom and right hand side of the video picture. This explanation does have some problems though, as both sides should have been altered when the aspect ratio is incorrect. This is NOT so in the Markus Allen snap-shot video picture, as only the top, bottom and right hand side are altered, as the left hand side is displaying normally and unaltered. The question has to be asked, has Markus Allen's video picture snap-shot been deliberately cropped? And if so WHY?

In my analysis below there does appear to be evidence of a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the two buildings location, as the red arrow does NOT point to the real location area of the two buildings that Markus Allen claims are MISSING? I've corrected the area on the picture below with two red arrows where the real location of the two buildings are. The picture analysis below also suggests evidence that three sides of the video picture used by Markus Allen have been cropped out. Does this suggest another attempt to deliberately mislead the viewer?



The picture above: shows the frame of reference of Markus Allen's snap-shot when overlaid on top of the Michael Hezarkhani raw version video picture, which demonstrates the cropping of the video to remove the buildings from the video picture.

We can only assume from Markus Allen's previous attempts of disinformation regarding the Michael Hezarkhani video (which my other two previous analysis/studies disproved), that he continues with his on-going effort to discredit the Michael Hezarkhani's video evidence as fake. He continues to perpetuated and facilitate the circulation and recirculation of his inaccurate material about the Michael Hezarkhani Flight 175 video widely across the inte.co.uk, not only on his own website, but also on other people's websites who are unknowingly spreading disinformation. Markus Allen is knowingly spreading disinformation, and yes I use the word "knowingly" as he is quite happy to leave his 'Flight 175 (rare video)' on his YouTube Channel when he knows that there is inaccurate and misleading information contained in his video, which has been promoted across the inte.co.uk. This is why the situation regarding Markus Allen appears to be another sinister attempt to discredit the Michael Hezarkhani 'Flight 175' video as fake.
Conclusion:

The buildings can be clearly identified in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage below.




Clearly yet again Markus Allen has committed a “WHOPPING ERROR” regarding the missing buildings in the Michael Hezarkhani video footage. From previous history regarding Markus Allen’s research in this area of this historic video, he continues to promote lies and spread falsehoods, which he is more than happy to do, for which he has clearly been exposed past and present.

This case is CLOSED!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of United Airlines ‘Flight 175’

Image
By Mark Conlon I would like to begin by thanking Julia Ratsey and Conspiracy Cuber for their help towards this blog post. Also thanks to Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall and Chris Hampton who have been supportive of my research.   United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAL 175) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles International Airport, in Los Angeles, California. On September 11 th 2001 UAL 175 was scheduled to depart at 08:00 a.m. for Los Angeles. Allegedly fifty-one passengers and the five hijackers boarded the 767 through Terminal C's Gate 19. The plane pushed back at 07:58 a.m. and took off at 08:14 a.m. from runway 9. It is estimated that UAL 175 was hijacked between 08:42 a.m. and 08:46 a.m. while American Airlines “Flight 11” (AAL 11) was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower. We are told the hijackers forcibly breached the cockpit and overpowered the pilot and first officer, allowing lead hijac...
Read more

Who Is 9/11 Harley Guy..? "Seeing Through The Disinformation"

Image
  By Mark Conlon   Much has been made in recent years of the use of "crisis actors" involved in relation to 9/11 and a number of " staged " terrorist attacks that followed. Much of the early promotion of "crisis actors" originated and was heavily promoted by Simon Shack, along with other so-called 9/11 researchers'.  One of the most famous 9/11 cases was the "Harley Guy" on Fox News who gave an account of the " official " 9/11 WTC building collapse story from the get-go, or did he? There has been many people who believe the "Harley Guy" to be actor Mark Adrian Humphries. Of course Mark Humphries denies any involvement on 9/11, and claims he was in Los Angeles at the time the 9/11 events were happening. See image below: Taken from Simon Shack's - September Clues forum.  So who is the "Harley Guy"? I still see and hear people accusing Mark Humphries of being the "Harley Guy". From research which doesn...
Read more

Flight 175 and The Truth about 'The Truth in 7 Minutes' in FIVE Minutes

Image
By: Mark Conlon - 25 Jan 2014   (Updated 24 Feb 2017) Short introduction and note by Andrew Johnson [ADJ] Below, Mark has carefully documented some further errors made by Markus Allen in a recent response to another error he made in an earlier video. The thrust of what Markus Allen appears to be trying to say is that “the videos of Flight 175 crashing into the WTC are fake”. This, of course, has been a topic much discussed on 9/11 “truth” websites. I have come to the conclusion, partly because of what I have covered in this article, that there has been a deliberate attempt to promote the 9/11 video fakery position in order to obscure or cover up the knowledge of the use of some type of image projection technology, which was used to create a very powerful illusion of plane crashes (for those chuckling about this idea, simply try and account for the physical evidence that plane wings cannot cut through steel box-girders and also account for the fact that some witnesses did not see or...
Read more