No-Planes "Video Fakery" Disinformation On FACEBOOK & Sunday Express "Perception Management" Article

By Mark Conlon 

 

I would like to draw people's attention to a couple of recent developments regarding "no-planes" theory on 9/11. There appears to be a video being circulated widely across the FACEBOOK platform which portrays the "no-plane" theory anomalies within the 2nd plane videos as "video fakery", going-on to promote inserted "CGI planes" into the 9/11 video evidence.

As many may know we have already established with research by Richard D. Hall and his 3D Radar Analysis and other researcher's; Andrew Johnson and myself, that it is most likely that the planes were some type of advanced "image projection" technology which were videoed and photographed by various eyewitnesses to the 2nd plane impact event in NYC.

From my own research I have already exposed various 9/11 researchers' who have "falsely" promoted "video fakery" as the answer to many of the anomalies captured in the 2nd plane impact videos. The promotion of "video fakery" was a clever "Psychological Operation" which was circulated to "cover-up" the existence of the "advanced" image projection technology. It has been the aim by those 9/11 researchers' such as; Simon Shack, Ace Baker, Markus Allen and many others to promote this "false" explanation to conceal such technology, something which I have written about in the past in my blog articles. 

I would urge anyone NOT to "Like" or "Share" this FACEBOOK video, as it is perpetuating the promotion of disinformation. If possible link our research material to counter such videos "falsely" promoting "video fakery" or "CGI Planes". 

Secondly, a news article was published online in the Sunday Express, a UK based online newspaper, where they managed to turn a landslide disaster which killed 17 people in Colombia into a "conspiracy theory" hit piece. 

    

The article made ridiculing references about "conspiracy theorists" in relation to advanced technology "Holograms" and "Project Blue Beam".  

Jon Austin the autor of the this article felt the need to take the opportunity from this terrible landslide disaster (which killed 17 people and displaced many from their homes), by turning the suvivour's religious beliefs towards a "light formation" which they interpreted to be an apparition of Jesus, to make a "mockery" of the disaster, by portraying anyone who believes in the existence of "Holograms" or "Project Blue Beam" as some sort of tin-foil hat wearing nut-case. I think this says far more about Jon Austin's state of mind than any conspiracy theorist's. 

I think Jon Austin should examin his own values and beliefs of what really matters when a diaster like this happens and consider the people who have lost their lives and the poor family members left behind who are grieving, whether they believe in Jesus or not, or whether a formation of light brought comfort to them in their time of grief from their interpretation that it was Jesus, rather than his own heartless, unempathic agenda to focus on "conspiracy theories" instead.

Is there more to the article than meets the eye? "Managing Perceptions"

Was the article combined deliberately to manage people's perceptions when it comes to advanced image projections technologies? Was the specifically article produced because of the growing numbers of people who are now believing that an advanced "image projection" or "hologram" was used on 9/11 to create the planes in the sky which hit the towers, thus to control people's perceptions regarding anyone who might question the veracity of the 9/11 video evidence of the "planes", implanting a sense of discouragment to believe in such technology, by already deliberately "implanting" a negative perception? As we know the "video fakery" Psychological -Opperation was used to conceal such "image projection" technology, and has now been exposed, along with those behind it. Are articles like this one above early interventions and damage control because more people are questioning "video fakery" and are now seeing that some type of "image projection" was used on 9/11? 

There seems no other reasonalble explanation for this article of a landslide disaster to have been subtly combined with "conspiracy theories", other than to discourage questioning minds and control peoples perceptions in relation to the advanced technology of holograms or image projections and 9/11. 


Thanks for reading...