"New Video" Conspiracy Cuber's - Response to Steve De'ak, His Theories, and the Formation of the Plane Shaped Holes


By Mark Conlon

I would like share another excellent piece of analysis by Conspiracy Cuber. In this new video he dispelled the claims made by Steve De'ak, who proposes "multiple missiles" caused the plane shaped hole damage at the WTC North Tower. In his analysis of the plane shaped hole damage Conspiracy Cuber demonstrates clearly use of a different process to cause the damage to steel beam/girders, which is consistent with the characteristics of a "Directed Energy Weapon", and also show disruptions in the earth's magnetic fields during all four points in NY.  

Also analysed were the missile reports which De'ak cites as evidence of missiles, which are inaccurately cited by De'ak, as no one can be identified or coming from anonymous sources and second hand reports.  

Also dealt with in this video is Steve De'ak's inaccurate reporting of communications between myself and Conspiracy Cuber, where De'ak accused myself of "deleting" my YouTube comments from a thread I was involved on De'ak's YouTube video. De'ak made a big-deal about this, but ignored information to my YouTube channel being terminated by YouTube, but still reported "falsely" that I had "deleted" my comments. Still reported inaccurately in De'ak's articles, even though he has been informed of the situation yet in the name of being accurate shows a total disregard for being honest in his reporting of what was exchanged in the comment thread, and is also noted how he "ignored" Conspiracy Cuber's offer of a PDF file of all the comments exchanged, which he has distorted when referring to the exchanges between us.

So I am glad this point was addressed in this video, and also the treatment of Conspiracy Cuber who merely challenged De'ak on his website regarding his theories, where De'ak blocked Conspiracy Cuber, which is a bit rich after De'ak mocked myself for not allowing comments on my blogsite, only contact via a "Contact Form" button directly to me. Note: De'ak did not use the contact form options on my blog, opting to make his communications public, yet then accused myself and Conspiracy Cuber of "stalking" him when reading his public comments, which again is the type of double-speak we hear from Steve De'ak over and over and over again. This video is an excellent documentation of the evidence which needs addressing.

Conspiracy Cuber's video below: 


Summing-up....
This is a great piece of research which correctly explains the observed evidence in relation to the plane shaped holes, and how they were made by use of a Directed Energy Weapon. The evidence supports this and De'ak is ignoring the magnetometer data and the unexplained fraying of the beams, and how Edna Sintron got to her position location in the plane hole, considering De'ak says the floors were all removed or missing before 9/11. De'ak clings to the "video fakery" theory because without this theory he cannot have 24 missiles hitting the both WTC towers. Steve De'ak cannot explain why there is no missile debris ejecting from the towers. 

Other observations and evidence to be considered...
De'ak cannot explain why there is 'NO' fuel contamination at the "Flight 93" crash site, as missiles he cites that caused the crater in Shanksville have fuel tanks. There should be some ground contamination in that crash crater. There was NOT. The fuel did not simply all burn-up either, observed with the "smoke plume" in a video and photograph. Grass was unburnt, other unusual side-effects were present which De'ak is ignoring or deliberately not addressing, like the fuming in the crater which started on the 12th Sept. He also has taken missile reports in relation to the "Flight 93" event out of context, similarly to what he has done at WTC event. Also you correctly show how he has lied regarding the false statements he made about me deleting my YT comments, which he still has not corrected  As you ask, WHY has De'ak NOT taken his evidence to court. Dr. Wood did, because she wasn't worried about submitting her evidence because of the Smith an Mundt Act. Perhaps De'ak is?

Thank you 'Conspiracy Cuber' for doing this analysis, and thank you to those of you for watching, reading and caring...

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of United Airlines ‘Flight 175’

Image
By Mark Conlon I would like to begin by thanking Julia Ratsey and Conspiracy Cuber for their help towards this blog post. Also thanks to Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall and Chris Hampton who have been supportive of my research.   United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAL 175) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles International Airport, in Los Angeles, California. On September 11 th 2001 UAL 175 was scheduled to depart at 08:00 a.m. for Los Angeles. Allegedly fifty-one passengers and the five hijackers boarded the 767 through Terminal C's Gate 19. The plane pushed back at 07:58 a.m. and took off at 08:14 a.m. from runway 9. It is estimated that UAL 175 was hijacked between 08:42 a.m. and 08:46 a.m. while American Airlines “Flight 11” (AAL 11) was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower. We are told the hijackers forcibly breached the cockpit and overpowered the pilot and first officer, allowing lead hijac
Read more

Who Is 9/11 Harley Guy..? "Seeing Through The Disinformation"

Image
  By Mark Conlon   Much has been made in recent years of the use of "crisis actors" involved in relation to 9/11 and a number of " staged " terrorist attacks that followed. Much of the early promotion of "crisis actors" originated and was heavily promoted by Simon Shack, along with other so-called 9/11 researchers'.  One of the most famous 9/11 cases was the "Harley Guy" on Fox News who gave an account of the " official " 9/11 WTC building collapse story from the get-go, or did he? There has been many people who believe the "Harley Guy" to be actor Mark Adrian Humphries. Of course Mark Humphries denies any involvement on 9/11, and claims he was in Los Angeles at the time the 9/11 events were happening. See image below: Taken from Simon Shack's - September Clues forum.  So who is the "Harley Guy"? I still see and hear people accusing Mark Humphries of being the "Harley Guy". From research which doesn
Read more

Flight 175 and The Truth about 'The Truth in 7 Minutes' in FIVE Minutes

Image
By: Mark Conlon - 25 Jan 2014   (Updated 24 Feb 2017) Short introduction and note by Andrew Johnson [ADJ] Below, Mark has carefully documented some further errors made by Markus Allen in a recent response to another error he made in an earlier video. The thrust of what Markus Allen appears to be trying to say is that “the videos of Flight 175 crashing into the WTC are fake”. This, of course, has been a topic much discussed on 9/11 “truth” websites. I have come to the conclusion, partly because of what I have covered in this article, that there has been a deliberate attempt to promote the 9/11 video fakery position in order to obscure or cover up the knowledge of the use of some type of image projection technology, which was used to create a very powerful illusion of plane crashes (for those chuckling about this idea, simply try and account for the physical evidence that plane wings cannot cut through steel box-girders and also account for the fact that some witnesses did not see or hea
Read more