Flight 11 - Still In The Air After It "Allegedly" Crashed on 9/11
By Mark Conlon
In this analysis and research I have conducted over the last few months shows that Flight 11 appears to be still in the air after it "allegedly" crashed into the North Tower. It appears from the FAA and NORAD communications recordings that Flight 11's last known coordinates were located 5.77 miles away from the North Tower after the crash.
Some debunkers have tried to distort this fact by saying it was mixed-up with Flight 77. This isn't correct, as the tail number: N334AA is reported in the communications and shows it was Flight 11 and NOT Flight 77 as suggested. Flight 11 was heading towards JFK Airport which is off-course towards the North Tower.
Flight 11's last coordinates were (40'38N 074'03W) which locates Flight 11 - 5.77 miles away from the North Tower after the crash. It is said in the communications that it was heading towards the Washington area. See below:
In this short video I made using FAA and NORAD communication recordings I include the relevant communication segments which I edited together to present here.
Again this has raised serious questions for me as to why 'Pilots For 9/11 Truth' have NOT covered this evidence? I am beginning to see a pattern in their research and presentation of evidence in relation to the planes.
Official Explanations for this "Damning" Evidence...
In the aftermath of 9/11 the scramble of Langley Fighters has been described by the Defence Department as a response to the hijacking of American 77, or United 93, or some combination of the two. Yet the report of American 11 heading towards Washington as the reason for the Langley Fighter Jets to be scrambled is not just reflected on the taped conversations at NEADS, but in taped conversations at FAA centres, on chat logs compiled at NEADS and NORAD, and other records.
In reality at 9:24am when fighter jets were scrambled from Langley, NEADS wasn’t even aware that American 77 or United 93 were hijacked. Why did the Defence Department lie about this?
Shortly after 9/11, a timeline provided by senior Defence Department officials to CNN will state, NORAD orders jets scrambled from Langley in order to “head to intercept” American 77.
Major General Larry Arnold, the CONR commander, will give a different explanation. He will tell the 9/11 Commission, “we launched the aircraft out of Langley to put them over top of Washington DC, not in response to American Airline 77, but really to put them in a position in case United 93 were to head that way.”
Neither story is truth.
Major Nasypany will tell the 9/11 Commission that the real reason for the Langley jets are scrambled and directed toward Baltimore area is to position them between the reportedly southbound American 11 and Washington, as a “barrier cap.”
It seems NORAD deliberately misled Congress and the 9/11 Commission by hiding the fact that the Langley scramble takes place in response to the report that American 11 is still airborne.
Thanks for reading, watching and caring...
In this short video I made using FAA and NORAD communication recordings I include the relevant communication segments which I edited together to present here.
Again this has raised serious questions for me as to why 'Pilots For 9/11 Truth' have NOT covered this evidence? I am beginning to see a pattern in their research and presentation of evidence in relation to the planes.
Official Explanations for this "Damning" Evidence...
In the aftermath of 9/11 the scramble of Langley Fighters has been described by the Defence Department as a response to the hijacking of American 77, or United 93, or some combination of the two. Yet the report of American 11 heading towards Washington as the reason for the Langley Fighter Jets to be scrambled is not just reflected on the taped conversations at NEADS, but in taped conversations at FAA centres, on chat logs compiled at NEADS and NORAD, and other records.
In reality at 9:24am when fighter jets were scrambled from Langley, NEADS wasn’t even aware that American 77 or United 93 were hijacked. Why did the Defence Department lie about this?
Shortly after 9/11, a timeline provided by senior Defence Department officials to CNN will state, NORAD orders jets scrambled from Langley in order to “head to intercept” American 77.
Major General Larry Arnold, the CONR commander, will give a different explanation. He will tell the 9/11 Commission, “we launched the aircraft out of Langley to put them over top of Washington DC, not in response to American Airline 77, but really to put them in a position in case United 93 were to head that way.”
Neither story is truth.
Major Nasypany will tell the 9/11 Commission that the real reason for the Langley jets are scrambled and directed toward Baltimore area is to position them between the reportedly southbound American 11 and Washington, as a “barrier cap.”
It seems NORAD deliberately misled Congress and the 9/11 Commission by hiding the fact that the Langley scramble takes place in response to the report that American 11 is still airborne.
Thanks for reading, watching and caring...
Comments
Post a Comment