The 9/11 Airplane Cell-Phone Calls


 By Mark Conlon


This short video it explains why it was impossible in 2001 for the nine FBI reported cell phone calls to have been made from the jetliners in flight. Prior to 2004 cell phone calls from fast high flying aircraft were impossible because of the technology then in use. If the cell phone calls could not have been made from the planes in flight the "official" story is false.

In 2004 Qualcomm Incorporated announced in a July 15, 2004 press release:"American Airlines and Qualcomm Complete Test Flight to Evaluate In-Cabin Mobile Phone Use" https://www.qualcomm.com/news/release"Qualcomm Incorporated and American Airlines today successfully demonstrated in-cabin voice communication using commercially available CDMA mobile phones on a commercial American Airlines aircraft. The proof-of-concept demonstration flight originated out of the Dallas/Fort Worth International airport. During the approximate two-hour flight, passengers were able to place and receive phone calls and text messages on their mobile phones. 'We are pleased to have worked so closely with American Airlines to complete this proof-of-concept demonstration for the in-flight use of 3G CDNA technology,' said Dr. Irwin Jacobs, chairman and CEO of Qualcomm."

On 9/11, people receiving cell calls "allegedly" from the hijacked aircraft reported the unusual clarity of the calls, as if they were calling from the next room. However, cell phone calls in the Qualcomm demonstration, "was about the same as a regular cell call on the ground, other than the loud background noise on the MD-80 jet." http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/w

This lack of background noise could make one wonder if those cell calls were really being placed from?

 "The Race To Allow Airborne Cell Phone Use" (Oct 1, 2004) - http://www.aviationtoday.com/2004/10/ "Several companies are racing toward a solution that combines satellite communications and onboard networks, from mid-2006, passengers should be able to begin using their own mobile phones for calls and text messaging. This service will be provided via the well-established Inmarsat constellation of geostationary satellites."


My Thoughts...

At this moment in time from my own research, I believe the phone calls were made from the ground and not from any of the four airplanes. I shall explain more about what I think the evidence indicates and tells us in my future blog posts, however I do now think some passengers and flight attendants were part of the training exercises taking place that morning on 9/11 simulating hijacking situations of planes.


Thank you for watching, reading and caring...



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In Search of United Airlines ‘Flight 175’

Image
By Mark Conlon I would like to begin by thanking Julia Ratsey and Conspiracy Cuber for their help towards this blog post. Also thanks to Andrew Johnson, Richard D. Hall and Chris Hampton who have been supportive of my research.   United Airlines “Flight 175” (UAL 175) was a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Logan International Airport, in Boston, Massachusetts, to Los Angeles International Airport, in Los Angeles, California. On September 11 th 2001 UAL 175 was scheduled to depart at 08:00 a.m. for Los Angeles. Allegedly fifty-one passengers and the five hijackers boarded the 767 through Terminal C's Gate 19. The plane pushed back at 07:58 a.m. and took off at 08:14 a.m. from runway 9. It is estimated that UAL 175 was hijacked between 08:42 a.m. and 08:46 a.m. while American Airlines “Flight 11” (AAL 11) was just minutes away from hitting the North Tower. We are told the hijackers forcibly breached the cockpit and overpowered the pilot and first officer, allowing lead hijac...
Read more

Who Is 9/11 Harley Guy..? "Seeing Through The Disinformation"

Image
  By Mark Conlon   Much has been made in recent years of the use of "crisis actors" involved in relation to 9/11 and a number of " staged " terrorist attacks that followed. Much of the early promotion of "crisis actors" originated and was heavily promoted by Simon Shack, along with other so-called 9/11 researchers'.  One of the most famous 9/11 cases was the "Harley Guy" on Fox News who gave an account of the " official " 9/11 WTC building collapse story from the get-go, or did he? There has been many people who believe the "Harley Guy" to be actor Mark Adrian Humphries. Of course Mark Humphries denies any involvement on 9/11, and claims he was in Los Angeles at the time the 9/11 events were happening. See image below: Taken from Simon Shack's - September Clues forum.  So who is the "Harley Guy"? I still see and hear people accusing Mark Humphries of being the "Harley Guy". From research which doesn...
Read more

Flight 175 and The Truth about 'The Truth in 7 Minutes' in FIVE Minutes

Image
By: Mark Conlon - 25 Jan 2014   (Updated 24 Feb 2017) Short introduction and note by Andrew Johnson [ADJ] Below, Mark has carefully documented some further errors made by Markus Allen in a recent response to another error he made in an earlier video. The thrust of what Markus Allen appears to be trying to say is that “the videos of Flight 175 crashing into the WTC are fake”. This, of course, has been a topic much discussed on 9/11 “truth” websites. I have come to the conclusion, partly because of what I have covered in this article, that there has been a deliberate attempt to promote the 9/11 video fakery position in order to obscure or cover up the knowledge of the use of some type of image projection technology, which was used to create a very powerful illusion of plane crashes (for those chuckling about this idea, simply try and account for the physical evidence that plane wings cannot cut through steel box-girders and also account for the fact that some witnesses did not see or...
Read more