sade050

Here's an excellent video analysis of Simon Shack's September Clues "moving buildings" conducted by: YougeneDebs - Published on Sep 16, 2009 .    This analysis by YougeneDebs demonstrates how Simon Shack "exploits" parallax views to "falsely" promote "video fakery" in the 9/11 video evidence record. Please see analysis video below:  As we can see in the analysis above, there is conclusive evidence that Simon Shack has knowingly "deceived" people by "exploiting" the parallax perspectives in his September Clues video, even though he was informed about his mistakes regarding the "moving buildings" in his September Clues film. unfortunately Simon Shack ignored this mistake and thus re-issued another version of his September Clues film with same mistake. What more evidence is their to present about Simon Shack's efforts to knowingly "deceive" people with his September Clues film in the name of prom

Here is an excellent video analysis of Simon Shack's September Clues Addendum film, exposing some of the deliberate "falsehoods" put-out by Simon Shack. Details and video below are from "YougeneDebs" YouTube Channel Published on Oct 18, 2009.   An investigation into Simon Shacks claim that a certain helicopter was absent from network footage during the collapse of WTC2; a claim made in his September Clues Addendum Chapter 1. And now that we have more information about a helicopter in the footage during the collapse of Tower Two, we can make a better judgment about Simons claim. Did Simon cut out inconvenient and potentially contradictory facts? It would seem so! What about poor research skills or willful negligence? I see no effort that Simon tried to find a longer clip of the zoomin showing a helicopter during the collapse.   And finally, did someone tamper with the evidence to bleach out not one, but 2 helicopters? Did Simon have the means, motive, an

By Mark Conlon In this "brief" analysis I shall demonstrate Simon Shack's "misrepresentation" of Flight 175's "alleged" flight path at 26:10 in his September Clues.  See below: screen-shot from 26:10 in September Clues.      Simon Shack suggests the plane's flight path is "rising" in the video? After past research conducted into Simon Shack's claims and methods of his presentation of evidence, I questioned whether or not Simon Shack had "accurately" represented the plane's flight path in this video. Checking the Evidence: I decided to try and track the plane's "actual" flight path (and not the plane flight path as suggested by Simon Shack in his film). I did this by "overlaying" two different video frames using an "earlier" time-frame and a "later" time frame as the plane travels towards the South Tower. See two screen-shot images below:  In the two screen-shot images abov

 By Mark Conlon In this analysis I’m going to explore Ace Baker's theory he proposes in his blogspot article video he published on the 27th May 2008, entitled - "Theory of Live 9/11 Airplanes Composites" and also in a later version which he included in his 2012 film entitled - "9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera". They both explain how he believes video compositing was used on 9/11 to " insert " in real-time, a flying airplane into the Fox News "Chopper 5" video. I will primarily be focusing my analysis on his later film - Chapter 7, called "The Key" from "9/11 The Great American Psy-Oprah". http://acebaker.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/theory-of-live-911-airplane-composites.html See below: Ace Baker's Theory of Live 9/11 Airplane Composites video: In Ace Baker's 2012 film 'The 9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera' - Chapter 7 "The Key", he explains how he believes a "fake" airplane was "

By Mark Conlon Here's an analysis I have done in relation to the alleged "POD" attachment theory of an "external" piece of equipment attached to the belly of the "Flight 175" plane, captured in many of the 9/11 videos before impacting the South Tower. This was first suggested by some prominent 9/11 researchers' in 2003-04 and over the years it has become a hot topic for debate, and still is today in 2017.  My reasons for my analysis: Over the last 4 years of investigating the "no-planes" theory and video evidence of 9/11, I have come to learn and understand of a "Psychological Operation" which appears to involve certain 9/11 researchers' who's aim is to cast doubt in peoples minds over the authenticity of the 9/11 video evidence, especially in relation to the videos of "Flight 175" crashing into the South Tower, in particular the Michael Hezarkhani video. It has been my quest to expose those "falsehoo