sade050

 By Mark Conlon This short video it explains why it was impossible in 2001 for the nine FBI reported cell phone calls to have been made from the jetliners in flight. Prior to 2004 cell phone calls from fast high flying aircraft were impossible because of the technology then in use. If the cell phone calls could not have been made from the planes in flight the "official" story is false. In 2004 Qualcomm Incorporated announced in a July 15, 2004 press release:"American Airlines and Qualcomm Complete Test Flight to Evaluate In-Cabin Mobile Phone Use" https://www.qualcomm.com/news/release "Qualcomm Incorporated and American Airlines today successfully demonstrated in-cabin voice communication using commercially available CDMA mobile phones on a commercial American Airlines aircraft. The proof-of-concept demonstration flight originated out of the Dallas/Fort Worth International airport. During the approximate two-hour flight, passengers were able to plac...

 By Mark Conlon A lot has been made of the deregistration process of UA175 and UA93, with it taking up to 4 years for both these planes to be deregistered on 28th Sept 2005. In reality this is nothing out of the ordinary, although some 9/11 researchers such as Jim Fetzer and others cite this as unusual when in fact it is not. One only has to take a look through the FAA Government Records to see it is not unusual for an aircraft to be deregistered many years later of its initial retirement of certification. So myself I would not use this point of fact to try and prove anomalies with UA175 and UA93 as some "prominent" 9/11 researchers have been doing over the years, as it simply proves nothing. I have listed some case examples below of planes which have taken a longer period of time to be deregistered.  Anyone can checkout tail numbers at the FAA Registry - Aircraft - N-Number Inquiry: https://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/nnum_inquiry.aspx Example 1: 28 December 1978; Uni...

  By Mark Conlon 9-11 Victims Compensation Fund:   This is where the US government opened up the Treasury and gave family members of those who lost their lives that day lots of money. In return, these families were basically told to shut-up about anything else concerning 9-11. (Considering all the lies surrounding this horrific event, you can see why.) Here are the results below: Flight 11: of the 92 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 20 are listed in the SSDI (22%) Of these 20 people, only three are on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: Judy Larocque Laurie Neira Candace Lee Williams       ===================================   Flight 77: of the 64 people who are listed as dying on this flight, only 14 are listed in the SSDI (22%)   Of these 64 people, only five on the 9-11 Compensation Fund list: William Caswell Eddie Dillard Ian Gray John Sammartino Leonard Taylor ===================================   Flight 175: of the 65 p...

By Mark Conlon The "unknown" statistic logged in relation to Flight 11 on 9/11 in the BTS data-base is often used as proof it never took-off on 9/11, yet there is other instances showing the same statistic of "unknown" during the year of 2001 involving Flight 11. (Flight 11 appears as a regular flight between BOS and LAX also on Tuesdays). The BTS system returns "UNKNOWN" along with the usual 00:00 data for September 4 and July 10, 2001. Also, there are no data at all available for August 7, 2001. In all other instances AA-11 appears to have flown on all Tuesdays before 9/11. SOURCE: Bureau of Transportation Statistics AA 07/10/2001 11 UNKNOWN LAX 07:45 00:00 366 0 0 00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A AA 08/07/2001 11 N/A LAX N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A AA 09/04/2001 11 UNKNOWN LAX 07:45 00:00 366 0 0 00:00 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A  Did the late Gerard Holmgren or Morgan Reynolds check these other flights out, or mention them as being "un...

By Mark Conlon State of play so far: 9/11 Airplanes.... I have been asked by some people if I could offer a brief summary of where the research and investigation into the airplanes on 9/11 is at so far.  I haven't included any links in this post, as the research is still in its early stages. Flight 93 – Evidence based information shows it landed at Reagan National Airport at 10:28am. All evidence indicating this took place. (Documented on my blog and also in Chris Hampton's film - 9/11 Alchemy "Facing Reality) Flight 11 – Evidenced based information shows it didn't hit the North Tower and was heading towards the Washington area after it was reported to have crashed into the North Tower. Supportive evidence is confirmed on FAA & NORAD "official " recordings, including plane tail number and last known coordinates. (Documented in previous posts here and at my blog) Speculation: Flight 11 landed at Reagan Airport at 9:37am. Flight 175 – Evidenced based...

By Mark Conlon Events at Reagan Airport on 9/11... (9:55 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Reagan Airport Control Tower Evacuated due to Report of Approaching Aircraft The air traffic control tower at Washington’s Reagan National Airport is evacuated, after it is informed that a suspicious aircraft—presumably Flight 93—is heading its way. Warning of Approaching Aircraft - In the control tower, supervisor Chris Stephenson receives a call from the FAA’s Herndon Command Center, telling him: “You have another [aircraft] headed your way. Confirmed bomb on board.” This information also makes it to the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) at the airport. Around this time, the Command Center changes the information it has for Flight 93’s flight plan, so that it shows a destination of Reagan Airport (see 9:55 a.m. September 11, 2001). This means air traffic controllers are now able to track the flight on their situation displays. But in response to the news that the approaching aircraft...

 By Mark Conlon In this analysis and research I have conducted over the last few months shows that Flight 11 appears to be still in the air after it "allegedly" crashed into the North Tower. It appears from the FAA and NORAD communications recordings that Flight 11's last known coordinates were located 5.77 miles away from the North Tower after the crash. Some debunkers have tried to distort this fact by saying it was mixed-up with Flight 77. This isn't correct, as the tail nu mber:  N334AA is reported in the communications and shows it was Flight 11 and NOT Flight 77 as suggested. Flight 11 was heading towards JFK Airport which is off-course towards the North Tower.  Flight 11's last coordinates were (40'38N 074'03W) which locates Flight 11 - 5.77 miles away from the North Tower after the crash. It is said in the communications that it was heading towards the Washington area. See below: In this short video I made using FAA and NORAD communicatio...